 |
Members of the neurosurgery team and contributors to the research project, from left, are Ursula Hummel, P.A.; Jai Thakur, M.D., Garrett Dyess; and Adnan Shahid, M.D. |
A team of medical students and faculty from the Whiddon College of Medicine, in collaboration with Vanderbilt University, published the first-of-its-kind qualitative and survey-based study capturing neurosurgery residency program directors’ perspectives on evaluating applicant research productivity.
The study was recently published in Cureus, a part of Springer Nature, and selected for a podium presentation at the upcoming Congress of Neurological Surgeons Annual Meeting, the largest neurosurgery conference in the world, to be held in Los Angeles in October. The outcome sheds new light on how research is weighed in the increasingly competitive residency selection process.
Neurosurgery applicants reported record-high research output in 2024, averaging 37.4 abstracts, presentations, and publications per applicant. This surge has raised concerns about an “arms race” in research productivity, particularly in the wake of the United States Medical Licensing Step 1 Exam (USMLE) transitioning to pass/fail scoring rather than identified rankings.
“Our findings reveal that while research is an important marker of dedication and potential, program directors place greater value on high-quality, meaningful work over sheer volume,” said Garrett Dyess, a second-year medical student at the Whiddon College of Medicine and lead author of the study. “They also consider institutional access to research opportunities, offering some reassurance for students from smaller programs.”
The study explored program directors’ views on quality versus quantity, basic science versus clinical research, and how research is weighed before and after residency interviews. Perspectives varied on whether the current competitive climate is harmful and on potential reforms, such as capping research submissions.
“This project represents an outstanding collaboration between medical students and faculty across institutions,” said David Williams, Ph.D., MPA, assistant dean for institutional and academic success at the Whiddon College of Medicine, who led the study’s qualitative methodology. “By increasing transparency, we hope to reduce stress and help future applicants focus on meaningful contributions rather than raw numbers.”
Key contributors to the project include Jai Thakur, M.D., chief of minimally invasive cranial and skull base neurosurgery at USA Health and director of neurosurgery education at USA; Lola Chambless, M.D., FAANS, neurosurgery residency program director and professor of neurological surgery at Vanderbilt University and chair of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Resident Committee; Williams; Adnan Shahid, M.D., former skull base fellow at USA Health and current pediatric neurosurgery fellow at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB); Danner Butler, M.D, former USA medical student and current UAB neurosurgery resident; Maxon Basset, fourth-year medical student at USA; Dyess; and Matthew Tao, second-year medical student at USA.
The full study is published in Cureus and available online at cureus.com.